Judgment of the Court; 22 December 2010; Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v Simone Pelz; Case C-491/10 PPU
In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, the court with jurisdiction in the Member State of enforcement cannot oppose the enforcement of a certified judgment, ordering the return of a child who has been wrongfully removed, on the ground that the court of the Member State of origin which handed down that judgment may have infringed Article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, interpreted in accordance with Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, since the assessment of whether there is such an infringement falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of origin.
- Reforma dokaznega prava v digitalni dobi
- Raznolikost izvršilnih naslovov pri čezmejni izterjavi dolgov v EU
- Train to Enforce
- Pravna sredstva v zvezi z izvrševanjem tujih sodnih odločb po Bruselj Ia (prenovitev)
- LAWTrain
- Razvoj in trendi v pravni ureditvi odvetništva v Sloveniji in Nemčiji
- Kontinentalno pravo proti "Common law" - presoja "pravil" dokaznega prava (testiranje dopustnosti elektronskih dokazov v anglosaškem in kontinentalnem pravnem sistemu)
- Razsežnosti dokazovanja v evropskem civilnem postopku
- Poenostavljena izterjava denarnih obveznosti v EU
- Vloga Pravne fakultete
- Konference in ostale aktivnosti
- Rezultati projekta
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Brussels Regulation
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Judgment of the Court; 27 November 2007; C; Case C-435/06
- Judgment of the Court; 29 November 2007; Kerstin Sundelind Lopez v Miguel Enrique Lopez Lizazo; Case C-68/07
- Judgment of the Court; 11 July 2008; Inga Rinau; Case C-195/08 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 2 April 2009; A; Case C-523/07
- Judgment of the Court; 16 July 2009; Laszlo Hadadi (Hadady) v Csilla Marta Mesko, épouse Hadadi (Hadady); Case C-168/08
- Judgment of the Court; 23 December 2009; Jasna Detiček v Maurizio Sgueglia; Case C-403/09 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 1 July 2010; Doris Povse v Mauro Alpago; Case C-211/10 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 15 July 2010; Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez; Case C-256/09
- Judgment of the Court; 5 October 2010; J. McB. v L. E.; Case C-400/10 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 9 November 2010; Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez; Case C-296/10
- Judgment of the Court; 22 December 2010; Barbara Mercredi v Richard Chaffe; Case C-497/10 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 22 December 2010; Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v Simone Pelz; Case C-491/10 PPU
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Evropski izvršilni naslov
- Medicina, pravo in družba
- CRP Vročanje