Judgement of the Court; 9 June 2011; in Case C 87/10; Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA
The first indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of distance selling, the place where the goods were or should have been delivered pursuant to the contract must be determined on the basis of the provisions of that contract.
In order to verify whether the place of delivery is determined ‘under the contract’, the national court seised must take account of all the relevant terms and clauses of that contract which are capable of clearly identifying that place, including terms and clauses which are generally recognised and applied through the usages of international trade or commerce, such as the Incoterms drawn up by the International Chamber of Commerce in the version published in 2000.
If it is impossible to determine the place of delivery on that basis, without referring to the substantive law applicable to the contract, the place of delivery is the place where the physical transfer of the goods took place, as a result of which the purchaser obtained, or should have obtained, actual power of disposal over those goods at the final destination of the sales transaction.
- Reforma dokaznega prava v digitalni dobi
- Raznolikost izvršilnih naslovov pri čezmejni izterjavi dolgov v EU
- Train to Enforce
- Pravna sredstva v zvezi z izvrševanjem tujih sodnih odločb po Bruselj Ia (prenovitev)
- LAWTrain
- Razvoj in trendi v pravni ureditvi odvetništva v Sloveniji in Nemčiji
- Kontinentalno pravo proti "Common law" - presoja "pravil" dokaznega prava (testiranje dopustnosti elektronskih dokazov v anglosaškem in kontinentalnem pravnem sistemu)
- Razsežnosti dokazovanja v evropskem civilnem postopku
- Poenostavljena izterjava denarnih obveznosti v EU
- Vloga Pravne fakultete
- Konference in ostale aktivnosti
- Rezultati projekta
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Brussels Regulation
- Article 1
- Article 5
- Judgement of the Court; 23 April 2009; in Case C 533/07,Privatstiftung, Thomas Rabitsch V Gisela Weller-Lindhorst
- Judgement of the Court; 9 July 2009; in Case C 204/08, Peter Rehder v Air Baltic Corporation
- Judgement of the Court; 16 July 2009; in Case C 189/08, Zuid-Chemie BV v Philippo’sMineralenfabriek NV/SA
- Judgement of the Court; 11 March 2010, in Case C 19/09, Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH V Silva Trade SA
- Judgement of the Court; 3 May 2007; in Case C-386/05, Drack GmbH V Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH
- Judgement of the Court; 9 June 2011; in Case C 87/10; Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA
- Judgement of the Court; 25 February 2010; in Case C 381/08; Car Trim GmbH v KeySafety Systems Srl
- Article 6
- Article 9
- Article 11
- Article 15
- Article 22
- Article 24
- Article 27
- Article 34 & 35
- Article 43
- Article 71
- Art. 267 AEUV
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Evropski izvršilni naslov
- Medicina, pravo in družba
- CRP Vročanje