Judgement of the Court; 25 February 2010; in Case C 381/08; Car Trim GmbH v KeySafety Systems Srl
1. Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that where the purpose of contracts is the supply of goods to be manufactured or produced and, even though the purchaser has specified certain requirements with regard to the provision, fabrication and delivery of the components to be produced, the purchaser has not supplied the materials and the supplier is responsible for the quality of the goods and their compliance with the contract, those contracts must be classified as a ‘sale of goods’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 5(1)(b) of that regulation.
2. The first indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of a sale involving carriage of goods, the place where, under the contract, the goods sold were delivered or should have been delivered must be determined on the basis of the provisions of that contract. Where it is impossible to determine the place of delivery on that basis, without reference to the substantive law applicable to the contract, that place is the place where the physical transfer of the goods took place, as a result of which the purchaser obtained, or should have obtained, actual power of disposal over those goods at the final destination of the sales transaction.
- Reforma dokaznega prava v digitalni dobi
- Raznolikost izvršilnih naslovov pri čezmejni izterjavi dolgov v EU
- Train to Enforce
- Pravna sredstva v zvezi z izvrševanjem tujih sodnih odločb po Bruselj Ia (prenovitev)
- LAWTrain
- Razvoj in trendi v pravni ureditvi odvetništva v Sloveniji in Nemčiji
- Kontinentalno pravo proti "Common law" - presoja "pravil" dokaznega prava (testiranje dopustnosti elektronskih dokazov v anglosaškem in kontinentalnem pravnem sistemu)
- Razsežnosti dokazovanja v evropskem civilnem postopku
- Poenostavljena izterjava denarnih obveznosti v EU
- Vloga Pravne fakultete
- Konference in ostale aktivnosti
- Rezultati projekta
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Brussels Regulation
- Article 1
- Article 5
- Judgement of the Court; 23 April 2009; in Case C 533/07,Privatstiftung, Thomas Rabitsch V Gisela Weller-Lindhorst
- Judgement of the Court; 9 July 2009; in Case C 204/08, Peter Rehder v Air Baltic Corporation
- Judgement of the Court; 16 July 2009; in Case C 189/08, Zuid-Chemie BV v Philippo’sMineralenfabriek NV/SA
- Judgement of the Court; 11 March 2010, in Case C 19/09, Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH V Silva Trade SA
- Judgement of the Court; 3 May 2007; in Case C-386/05, Drack GmbH V Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH
- Judgement of the Court; 9 June 2011; in Case C 87/10; Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA
- Judgement of the Court; 25 February 2010; in Case C 381/08; Car Trim GmbH v KeySafety Systems Srl
- Article 6
- Article 9
- Article 11
- Article 15
- Article 22
- Article 24
- Article 27
- Article 34 & 35
- Article 43
- Article 71
- Art. 267 AEUV
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Evropski izvršilni naslov
- Medicina, pravo in družba
- CRP Vročanje