Judgment of the Court; 6 October 1976; Industrie Tessili Italiana Como v Dunlop AG; in Case 12-76
THE ' PLACE OF PERFORMANCE OF THE OBLIGATION IN QUESTION ' WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 5 ( 1 ) OF THE CONVENTION OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1968 ON JURISDICTION AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS IS TO BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW WHICH GOVERNS THE OBLIGATIONS IN QUESTION ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS OF THE COURT BEFORE WHICH THE MATTER IS BROUGHT.
- Reforma dokaznega prava v digitalni dobi
- Raznolikost izvršilnih naslovov pri čezmejni izterjavi dolgov v EU
- Train to Enforce
- Pravna sredstva v zvezi z izvrševanjem tujih sodnih odločb po Bruselj Ia (prenovitev)
- LAWTrain
- Razvoj in trendi v pravni ureditvi odvetništva v Sloveniji in Nemčiji
- Kontinentalno pravo proti "Common law" - presoja "pravil" dokaznega prava (testiranje dopustnosti elektronskih dokazov v anglosaškem in kontinentalnem pravnem sistemu)
- Razsežnosti dokazovanja v evropskem civilnem postopku
- Poenostavljena izterjava denarnih obveznosti v EU
- Vloga Pravne fakultete
- Konference in ostale aktivnosti
- Rezultati projekta
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 5 no. 1
- Judgment of the Court; 6 October 1976; Industrie Tessili Italiana Como v Dunlop AG; in Case 12-76
- Judgment of the Court; 6 October 1976;A. De Bloos, SPRL v Société en commandite par actions Bouyer; in Case 14-76
- Judgment of the Court; 17 January 1980; Siegfried Zelger v Sebastiano Salinitri; in Case 56/79
- Judgment of the Court ; 4 March 1982; Effer SpA v Hans-Joachim Kantner; in Case 38/81
- Judgement of the Court; 26 MAY 1982; Roger Ivenel v Helmut Schwab; in Case 133/81
- Judgment of the Court; 22 March 1983; Martin Peters Bauunternehmung GmbH v Zuid Nederlandse Aannemers Vereniging; in Case 34/82
- Judgement of the Court; 15 January 1987; in Case 266/85; Hassan Shenavai, Rockenhausen (Federal Republic of Germany), and Klaus Kreischer, Geleen (Netherlands)
- Judgment of the Court; 8 March 1988; SPRL Arcado v SA Haviland; in Case 9/87
- Judgment of the Court; 15 February 1989; Six Constructions Ltd v Paul Humbert; in Case 32/88
- Judgment of the Court; 15 May 1990; Kongress Agentur Hagen GmbH v Zeehaghe BV.; in Case C-365/88
- Judgment of the Court; 17 June 1992; Jakob Handte & Co. GmbH v Traitements Mécano-chimiques des Surfaces SA; in Case C-26/91
- Judgment of the Court ; 13 July 1993; Mulox IBC Ltd v Hendrick Geels; in Case C-125/92
- Judgment of the Court; 29 June 1994; Custom Made Commercial Ltd v Stawa Metallbau GmbH; in Case C-288/92
- Judgment of the Court; 9 January 1997; Petrus Wilhelmus Rutten v Cross Medical Ltd.; in Case C-383/95
- Judgment of the Court; 20 February 1997; Mainschiffahrts-Genossenschaft eG (MSG) v Les Gravières Rhénanes SARL; in Case C-106/95
- Judgment of the Court; 27 October 1998; Réunion européenne SA and Others v Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor BV and the Master of the vessel Alblasgracht V002; in Case C-51/97
- Judgment of the Court; 28 September 1999; GIE Groupe Concorde and Othes v The Master of the vessel "Suhadiwarno Panjan" and Others; in Case C-440/97
- Judgement of the Court; 5 October 1999; in Case C-420/97, Leathertex Divisione Sintetici SpA and Bodetex BVBA
- Judgment of the Court; 19 February 2002; Besix SA v Wasserreinigungsbau Alfred Kretzschmar GmbH & Co. KG (WABAG) and Planungs- und Forschungsgesellschaft Dipl. Ing. W. Kretzschmar GmbH & KG (Plafog); in Case C-256/00
- Judgment of the Court; 27 February 2002; Herbert Weber v Universal Ogden Services Ltd; in Case C-37/00
- Judgment of the Court; 17 September 2002; Fonderie Officine Meccaniche Tacconi SpA v Heinrich Wagner Sinto Maschinenfabrik GmbH (HWS); in Case C-334/00
- Judgment of the Court; 10 April 2003; Giulia Pugliese v Finmeccanica SpA, Betriebsteil Alenia Aerospazio; in Case C-437/00
- Judgement of the Court; 5 February 2004; in Case C-265/02, Frahuil SA and Assitalia SpA
- Judgement of the Court; 20 January 2005; In Case C-27/02, Petra Engler v Janus Versand GmbH
- Article 5 no. 2
- Article 5 no. 3
- Article 5 no. 5
- Article 6
- Article 7
- Article 12
- Article 13
- Article 16 no. 1
- Article 16 no. 4
- Article 16 no. 5
- Article 17
- Article 18
- Article 19
- Article 21
- Article 22
- Article 23
- Article 24
- Article 25
- Article 26
- Article 27 no. 1
- Article 27 no. 2
- Article 27 no. 3
- Article 30
- Article 31
- Article 33
- Article 36
- Article 37
- Article 38
- Article 39
- Article 40
- Article 46
- Article 47
- Article 50
- Article 52
- Article 54
- Article 55
- Article 56
- Article 57
- Brussels Regulation
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Evropski izvršilni naslov
- Medicina, pravo in družba
- CRP Vročanje