Judgment of the Court; 10 October 1996; Bernardus Hendrikman and Maria Feyen v Magenta Druck & Verlag GmbH; in Case C-78/95
Article 27(2) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 relating to the accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, applies to judgments given against a defendant who was not duly served with, or notified of, the document instituting proceedings in sufficient time and who was not validly represented during those proceedings, albeit the judgments given were not given in default of appearance because someone purporting to represent the defendant appeared before the court first seised.
- Reforma dokaznega prava v digitalni dobi
- Raznolikost izvršilnih naslovov pri čezmejni izterjavi dolgov v EU
- Train to Enforce
- Pravna sredstva v zvezi z izvrševanjem tujih sodnih odločb po Bruselj Ia (prenovitev)
- LAWTrain
- Razvoj in trendi v pravni ureditvi odvetništva v Sloveniji in Nemčiji
- Kontinentalno pravo proti "Common law" - presoja "pravil" dokaznega prava (testiranje dopustnosti elektronskih dokazov v anglosaškem in kontinentalnem pravnem sistemu)
- Razsežnosti dokazovanja v evropskem civilnem postopku
- Poenostavljena izterjava denarnih obveznosti v EU
- Vloga Pravne fakultete
- Konference in ostale aktivnosti
- Rezultati projekta
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 5 no. 1
- Article 5 no. 2
- Article 5 no. 3
- Article 5 no. 5
- Article 6
- Article 7
- Article 12
- Article 13
- Article 16 no. 1
- Article 16 no. 4
- Article 16 no. 5
- Article 17
- Article 18
- Article 19
- Article 21
- Article 22
- Article 23
- Article 24
- Article 25
- Article 26
- Article 27 no. 1
- Article 27 no. 2
- Judgment of the Court; 21 May 1980; Bernard Denilauler v SNC Couchet Frères; in Case 125/79
- Judgment of the Court; 16 June 1981; Peter Klomps v Karl Michel; in Case 166/80
- Judgment of the Court; 15 July 1982; Pendy Plastic Products BV v Pluspunkt Handelsgesellschaft mbH.; in Case 228/81
- Judgment of the Court; 11 June 1985; Leon Emile Gaston Carlos Debaecker and Berthe Plouvier v Cornelis Gerrit Bouwman; in Case 49/84
- Judgment of the Court; 3 July 1990; Isabelle Lancray SA v Peters und Sickert KG; in Case C-305/88
- Judgment of the Court; 12 November 1992; Minalmet GmbH v Brandeis Ltd.; in Case C-123/91
- Judgment of the Court; 21 April 1993; Volker Sonntag v Hans Waidmann, Elisabeth Waidmann and Stefan Waidmann; in Case C-172/91
- Judgment of the Court; 13. July 1995; Hengst Import BV v Anna Maria Campese; in Case C-474/93
- Judgment of the Court; 10 October 1996; Bernardus Hendrikman and Maria Feyen v Magenta Druck & Verlag GmbH; in Case C-78/95
- Judgement of the Court; 14 October 2004; in Case C-39/02; Mærsk Olie & Gas A/S and Firma M. de Haan en W. de Boer
- Judgement of the Court; 13 October 2005; in Case C-522/03; Scania Finance France SA v Rockinger Spezialfabrik für Anhängerkupplungen GmbH & Co.
- Article 27 no. 3
- Article 30
- Article 31
- Article 33
- Article 36
- Article 37
- Article 38
- Article 39
- Article 40
- Article 46
- Article 47
- Article 50
- Article 52
- Article 54
- Article 55
- Article 56
- Article 57
- Brussels Regulation
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Evropski izvršilni naslov
- Medicina, pravo in družba
- CRP Vročanje