Judgment of the Court; 8 December 1987; Gubisch Maschinenfabrik KG v Giulio Palumbo; in Case 144/86
The concept of lis pendens pursuant to Article 21 of the Convention of 27 September 1968 covers a case where a party brings an action before a court in a Contracting State for the rescission or discharge of an international sales contract whilst an action by the other party to enforce the same contract is pending before a court in another Contracting State.
- Reforma dokaznega prava v digitalni dobi
- Raznolikost izvršilnih naslovov pri čezmejni izterjavi dolgov v EU
- Train to Enforce
- Pravna sredstva v zvezi z izvrševanjem tujih sodnih odločb po Bruselj Ia (prenovitev)
- LAWTrain
- Razvoj in trendi v pravni ureditvi odvetništva v Sloveniji in Nemčiji
- Kontinentalno pravo proti "Common law" - presoja "pravil" dokaznega prava (testiranje dopustnosti elektronskih dokazov v anglosaškem in kontinentalnem pravnem sistemu)
- Razsežnosti dokazovanja v evropskem civilnem postopku
- Poenostavljena izterjava denarnih obveznosti v EU
- Vloga Pravne fakultete
- Konference in ostale aktivnosti
- Rezultati projekta
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 5 no. 1
- Article 5 no. 2
- Article 5 no. 3
- Article 5 no. 5
- Article 6
- Article 7
- Article 12
- Article 13
- Article 16 no. 1
- Article 16 no. 4
- Article 16 no. 5
- Article 17
- Article 18
- Article 19
- Article 21
- Judgment of the Court; 7 June 1984; Siegfried Zelger v Sebastiano Salinitri; in Case 129/83
- Judgment of the Court; 8 December 1987; Gubisch Maschinenfabrik KG v Giulio Palumbo; in Case 144/86
- Judgment of the Court; 27 June 1991; Overseas Union Insurance Ltd and Deutsche Ruck Uk Reinsurance Ltd and Pine Top Insurance Company Ltd v New Hampshire Insurance Company; in Case C-351/89
- Judgment of the Court; 20 January 1994; Owens Bank Ltd v Fulvio Bracco and Bracco Industria Chimica SpA; in Case C-129/92
- Judgment of the Court; 10 February 1994; Mund & Fester v Hatrex Internationaal Transport; in Case C-398/92
- Judgment of the Court; 6 December 1994; The owners of the cargo lately laden on board the ship "Tatry" v the owners of the ship "Maciej Rataj; in Case C-406/92
- Judgment of the Court; 9 October 1997; Elsbeth Freifrau von Horn v Kevin Cinnamond; in Case C-163/95
- Judgment of the Court; 19 May 1998; Drouot assurances SA v Consolidated metallurgical industries (CMI industrial sites), Protea assurance and Groupement d'intérêt économique (GIE) Réunion européenne; in Case C-351/96
- Judgement of the Court; 8 May 2003; in Case C-111/01, Gantner Electronic GmbH and Basch Exploitatie Maatschappij BV
- Judgement of the Court; 9 December 2003; in Case C-116/02; Erich Gasser GmbH and MISAT Srl
- Judgement of the Court; 27 April 2004; in Case C-159/02, Gregory Paul Turner and Felix Fareed Ismail Grovit, Harada Ltd, Changepoint SA
- Judgement of the Court; 14 October 2004; in Case C-39/02, Mærsk Olie & Gas A/S and Firma M. de Haan en W. de Boer
- Article 22
- Article 23
- Article 24
- Article 25
- Article 26
- Article 27 no. 1
- Article 27 no. 2
- Article 27 no. 3
- Article 30
- Article 31
- Article 33
- Article 36
- Article 37
- Article 38
- Article 39
- Article 40
- Article 46
- Article 47
- Article 50
- Article 52
- Article 54
- Article 55
- Article 56
- Article 57
- Brussels Regulation
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Evropski izvršilni naslov
- Medicina, pravo in družba
- CRP Vročanje