
The Jean Monnet Seminar on Regulating Short-Term Rentals: The Interplay Between Housing Challenges and Market Freedoms
Jean Monnet Seminar Summary
Regulating Short-Term Rentals: The Interplay Between Housing Challenges and Market Freedoms
Date: Monday, 29 September 2025 • Format: Online (MS Teams)
Overview. The seminar examined how EU law, national policy, and local practice intersect in regulating short-term rentals (STR). Speakers from academia, EU institutions, and city government discussed legal constraints (Services Directive, Article 16 Charter), policy design, and on-the-ground implementation. Two cross-cutting themes dominated: proportionality (targeted, evidence-based restrictions) and data (registration, interoperability, and platform cooperation as prerequisites for enforceable, proportionate rules).
Opening (Dr Janja Hojnik, Faculty of Law, University of Maribor). Framed the core trade-offs—public interest vs. entrepreneurship, tourism vs. housing affordability, right to a home vs. free movement—set the seminar’s questions and objectives.
Slovenian framework (Dubravka Kalin, Director General for Tourism, Ministry of the Economy, Tourism and Sport). Presented the newly adopted Hospitality Act as the outcome of three decades of debate. The Act adds conditions and simplifications, introduces time limits and a risk-based classification of municipalities, and will lean more on digitalisation of STR. Faculty of Economics studies (Airbnb/Vrbo) were cited to show rapid STR growth outpacing safeguards for other interests.
Fundamental freedoms (Tim Horvat, Lawyer at the Court of Justice of the EU). Emphasised that housing rules are business regulations subject to CJEU scrutiny under Article 16 of the Charter. Reviewed key case law (including Alemo-Herron and AEON Nepremičnine) and stressed the centrality of the proportionality test.
EU law & policy landscape (Živa Šuta, Faculty of Law, University of Maribor). Asked whether, to what extent, and how the EU should engage on housing. Highlighted the rising role of EU law and the CJEU, again underscoring proportionality as the analytic lens.