Judgement of the Court; 9 July 2009; in Case C 204/08, Peter Rehder v Air Baltic Corporation
The second indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of air transport of passengers from one Member State to another Member State, carried out on the basis of a contract with only one airline, which is the operating carrier, the court having jurisdiction to deal with a claim for compensation founded on that transport contract and on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, is that, at the applicant’s choice, which has territorial jurisdiction over the place of departure or place of arrival of the aircraft, as those places are agreed in that contract.
- DIGI - GUARD
- Diversity of Enforcement Titles in cross-border Debt Collection in EU
- Train to Enforce
- Remedies concerning Enforcement of Foreign Judgements according to Brussels I Recast
- LAWtrain
- Developments and trend in the regulation of the attorney's profession with the emphasis on Slovenia and Germany
- Civil vs "Common Law" – the assessment of »rules« of evidence law (testing the admissibility of electronic evidence in common law and continental law systems)
- Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure
- Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU
- Role of Faculty of Law
- Conferences and other activities
- Project results
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Brussels Regulation
- Article 1
- Article 5
- Judgement of the Court; 23 April 2009; in Case C 533/07,Privatstiftung, Thomas Rabitsch V Gisela Weller-Lindhorst
- Judgement of the Court; 9 July 2009; in Case C 204/08, Peter Rehder v Air Baltic Corporation
- Judgement of the Court; 16 July 2009; in Case C 189/08, Zuid-Chemie BV v Philippo’sMineralenfabriek NV/SA
- Judgement of the Court; 11 March 2010, in Case C 19/09, Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH V Silva Trade SA
- Judgement of the Court; 3 May 2007; in Case C-386/05, Drack GmbH V Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH
- Judgement of the Court; 9 June 2011; in Case C 87/10; Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA
- Judgement of the Court; 25 February 2010; in Case C 381/08; Car Trim GmbH v KeySafety Systems Srl
- Article 6
- Article 9
- Article 11
- Article 15
- Article 22
- Article 24
- Article 27
- Article 34 & 35
- Article 43
- Article 71
- Art. 267 AEUV
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- European Enforcement Order
- Medicine, Law and Society
- CRP Service