Judgement of the Court; 11 March 2010, in Case C 19/09, Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH V Silva Trade SA
1. The second indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that that provision is applicable in the case where services are provided in several Member States.
2. The second indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that where services are provided in several Member States, the court which has jurisdiction to hear and determine all the claims arising from the contract is the court in whose jurisdiction the place of the main provision of services is situated. For a commercial agency contract, that place is the place of the main provision of services by the agent, as it appears from the provisions of the contract or, in the absence of such provisions, the actual performance of that contract or, where it cannot be established on that basis, the place where the agent is domiciled.
- DIGI - GUARD
- Diversity of Enforcement Titles in cross-border Debt Collection in EU
- Train to Enforce
- Remedies concerning Enforcement of Foreign Judgements according to Brussels I Recast
- LAWtrain
- Developments and trend in the regulation of the attorney's profession with the emphasis on Slovenia and Germany
- Civil vs "Common Law" – the assessment of »rules« of evidence law (testing the admissibility of electronic evidence in common law and continental law systems)
- Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure
- Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU
- Role of Faculty of Law
- Conferences and other activities
- Project results
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Brussels Regulation
- Article 1
- Article 5
- Judgement of the Court; 23 April 2009; in Case C 533/07,Privatstiftung, Thomas Rabitsch V Gisela Weller-Lindhorst
- Judgement of the Court; 9 July 2009; in Case C 204/08, Peter Rehder v Air Baltic Corporation
- Judgement of the Court; 16 July 2009; in Case C 189/08, Zuid-Chemie BV v Philippo’sMineralenfabriek NV/SA
- Judgement of the Court; 11 March 2010, in Case C 19/09, Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH V Silva Trade SA
- Judgement of the Court; 3 May 2007; in Case C-386/05, Drack GmbH V Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH
- Judgement of the Court; 9 June 2011; in Case C 87/10; Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA
- Judgement of the Court; 25 February 2010; in Case C 381/08; Car Trim GmbH v KeySafety Systems Srl
- Article 6
- Article 9
- Article 11
- Article 15
- Article 22
- Article 24
- Article 27
- Article 34 & 35
- Article 43
- Article 71
- Art. 267 AEUV
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- European Enforcement Order
- Medicine, Law and Society
- CRP Service