Judgment of the Court; 22 December 2010; Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v Simone Pelz; Case C-491/10 PPU
In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, the court with jurisdiction in the Member State of enforcement cannot oppose the enforcement of a certified judgment, ordering the return of a child who has been wrongfully removed, on the ground that the court of the Member State of origin which handed down that judgment may have infringed Article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, interpreted in accordance with Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, since the assessment of whether there is such an infringement falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of origin.
- DIGI - GUARD
- Diversity of Enforcement Titles in cross-border Debt Collection in EU
- Train to Enforce
- Remedies concerning Enforcement of Foreign Judgements according to Brussels I Recast
- LAWtrain
- Developments and trend in the regulation of the attorney's profession with the emphasis on Slovenia and Germany
- Civil vs "Common Law" – the assessment of »rules« of evidence law (testing the admissibility of electronic evidence in common law and continental law systems)
- Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure
- Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU
- Role of Faculty of Law
- Conferences and other activities
- Project results
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Brussels Regulation
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Judgment of the Court; 27 November 2007; C; Case C-435/06
- Judgment of the Court; 29 November 2007; Kerstin Sundelind Lopez v Miguel Enrique Lopez Lizazo; Case C-68/07
- Judgment of the Court; 11 July 2008; Inga Rinau; Case C-195/08 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 2 April 2009; A; Case C-523/07
- Judgment of the Court; 16 July 2009; Laszlo Hadadi (Hadady) v Csilla Marta Mesko, épouse Hadadi (Hadady); Case C-168/08
- Judgment of the Court; 23 December 2009; Jasna Detiček v Maurizio Sgueglia; Case C-403/09 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 1 July 2010; Doris Povse v Mauro Alpago; Case C-211/10 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 15 July 2010; Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez; Case C-256/09
- Judgment of the Court; 5 October 2010; J. McB. v L. E.; Case C-400/10 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 9 November 2010; Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez; Case C-296/10
- Judgment of the Court; 22 December 2010; Barbara Mercredi v Richard Chaffe; Case C-497/10 PPU
- Judgment of the Court; 22 December 2010; Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v Simone Pelz; Case C-491/10 PPU
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- European Enforcement Order
- Medicine, Law and Society
- CRP Service