Judgment of the Court; 21 May 1980; Bernard Denilauler v SNC Couchet Frères; in Case 125/79
JUDICIAL DECISIONS AUTHORIZING PROVISIONAL OR PROTECTIVE MEASURES , WHICH ARE DELIVERED WITHOUT THE PARTY AGAINST WHICH THEY ARE DIRECTED HAVING BEEN SUMMONED TO APPEAR AND WHICH ARE INTENDED TO BE ENFORCED WITHOUT PRIOR SERVICE DO NOT COME WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT PROVIDED FOR BY TITLE III OF THE CONVENTION OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1968 ON JURISDICTION AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS .
- DIGI - GUARD
- Diversity of Enforcement Titles in cross-border Debt Collection in EU
- Train to Enforce
- Remedies concerning Enforcement of Foreign Judgements according to Brussels I Recast
- LAWtrain
- Developments and trend in the regulation of the attorney's profession with the emphasis on Slovenia and Germany
- Civil vs "Common Law" – the assessment of »rules« of evidence law (testing the admissibility of electronic evidence in common law and continental law systems)
- Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure
- Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU
- Role of Faculty of Law
- Conferences and other activities
- Project results
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Brussels Regulation
- Brussels Convention
- Protocol on the interpretation of the Brussels Convention
- Brussels Convention
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 5 no. 1
- Article 5 no. 2
- Article 5 no. 3
- Article 5 no. 5
- Article 6
- Article 7
- Article 12
- Article 13
- Article 16 no. 1
- Article 16 no. 4
- Article 16 no. 5
- Article 17
- Article 18
- Article 19
- Article 21
- Article 22
- Article 23
- Article 24
- Article 25
- Article 26
- Article 27 no. 1
- Article 27 no. 2
- Judgment of the Court; 21 May 1980; Bernard Denilauler v SNC Couchet Frères; in Case 125/79
- Judgment of the Court; 16 June 1981; Peter Klomps v Karl Michel; in Case 166/80
- Judgment of the Court; 15 July 1982; Pendy Plastic Products BV v Pluspunkt Handelsgesellschaft mbH.; in Case 228/81
- Judgment of the Court; 11 June 1985; Leon Emile Gaston Carlos Debaecker and Berthe Plouvier v Cornelis Gerrit Bouwman; in Case 49/84
- Judgment of the Court; 3 July 1990; Isabelle Lancray SA v Peters und Sickert KG; in Case C-305/88
- Judgment of the Court; 12 November 1992; Minalmet GmbH v Brandeis Ltd.; in Case C-123/91
- Judgment of the Court; 21 April 1993; Volker Sonntag v Hans Waidmann, Elisabeth Waidmann and Stefan Waidmann; in Case C-172/91
- Judgment of the Court; 13. July 1995; Hengst Import BV v Anna Maria Campese; in Case C-474/93
- Judgment of the Court; 10 October 1996; Bernardus Hendrikman and Maria Feyen v Magenta Druck & Verlag GmbH; in Case C-78/95
- Judgement of the Court; 14 October 2004; in Case C-39/02; Mærsk Olie & Gas A/S and Firma M. de Haan en W. de Boer
- Judgement of the Court; 13 October 2005; in Case C-522/03; Scania Finance France SA v Rockinger Spezialfabrik für Anhängerkupplungen GmbH & Co.
- Article 27 no. 3
- Article 30
- Article 31
- Article 33
- Article 36
- Article 37
- Article 38
- Article 39
- Article 40
- Article 46
- Article 47
- Article 50
- Article 52
- Article 54
- Article 55
- Article 56
- Article 57
- Brussels Regulation
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
- Council regulation (EC) No 1348/2000
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
- Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
- European Enforcement Order
- Medicine, Law and Society
- CRP Service