Programme
Sunday, May 25 | Meeting of participants (Stradun, Gradska kavana, 19,30‐20,00) Informal joint dinner |
Monday, May 26
Registration (9,00 ‐ 9,30) Opening (9,30 - 13,00) [Coffee break 11,00 ‐ 11,30]
Lunch Break (13,00 - 15,00)
Afternoon Session (15,00 - 18,00)
| Opening speeches Laura Ervo (Helsinki): Should Fair Trial Rights Be Redefined? Danie van Loggerenberg (Pretoria, South Africa): What is happening to fundamental procedural guarantees in the area of civil justice? A View from South Africa Alan Uzelac (Zagreb): Access to Justice in the 21st Century: Are Current Judicial Practices Hopelessly Antiquated? Evidence, Communication Techniques, Trials General discussion Book Presentation (Nobody’s Perfect: Appeals against Judgments in Civil Litigation); Preparatory information for the EU JUST Book in the project “Dimensions of Evidence in Europan Civil Procedure” Sebastian Spinei (Sibiu): The Right Principles –What Outcome? Fundamental procedural rights and their implementation in Romanian Civil Procedure Ivan Milotić (Zagreb): Roman Foundations of Modern Concepts on Access to Justice and Their Relevance for Contemporary Societies Katharina Auernig (Vienna): The Right to Be Heard in Arbitration Proceedings – a Comparative Approach |
Tuesday, May 27
Morning Session (9,30 - 13,00) [Coffee break 11,00 ‐ 11,30]
Lunch Break (13,00 - 15,00)
Afternoon Session (15,00 ‐ 18,00) | Aleš Galič (Ljubljana): Inconsistency of Case Law and Right to a Fair Trial Richard Marcus (San Francisco): American Misgivings About U.S. Exceptionalism – Court Access as a Zero/Sum Game Magne Strandberg (Bergen): Article 6(2) of European Human Rights Convention as a Basis for a Standard of Evidence in Civil Cases ‐ Remarks on Some Supreme Court Judgments Andrej Auersperger Matić (Brussels): Access to Justice in the EU: Conceptual Dilemmas and Practical Challenges
Jon T. Johnsen (Oslo): Proper Judicial Time‐Management as Procedural Human Right Slađana Aras (Zagreb): Are Financial Burdens Preventing Access to Justice in Southeast European Judicial Systems? Anthony Valcke (Brussels), Legal Information, Advice and Assistance in the Western Balkans and Turkey Zvonimir Jelinić (Osijek): Fighting Recession at the Expense of Access to Justice. The Case of Croatian Financial Operations and Pre‐Bankruptcy Settlements Act |
Wednesday, May 28
Morning session (9,00 - 14,00)
[Coffee break 11,00 ‐ 11,30]
Lunch break (14,00 - 15,00)
Afternoon Study Trip
|
Stefan Voet (Ghent): Legal Aid in a European Context Fu Yulin (Beijing): Conciliation and Access to Justice: a Chinese Perspective Pablo Bravo Hurtado (Maastricht; Chile): Access to the Supreme Court: A Human Right? General discussion Afternoon: Trip to Cavtat, Dinner on Bosanka Hill (optional) |
Thursday, May 29
Morning Session(9,30‐13,00)
Lunch Break (13,00 – 15,00)
Afternoon Session (15,00 - 18,00)
|
Jorg Sladič (Ljubljana), Conditions of Admissibility and Access to Justice ‐ A Slovenian perspective Adela Ognean (Sibiu): Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time: Problems and Challenges in Romanian Civil Procedure Tanja Domej (Zürich): Access to justice ‐ Current Issues in Switzerland Natalia Baradanchenkova & Ksenia Sergeeva (Yekaterinburg), Russian judicial reform and how it may affect procedural human rights and access to justice General discussion Olaf Halvorsen Rønning (Oslo): Current ECHR Case Law on Procedural Issues Regarding Applications and Decisions on Legal Aid Tomislav Karlović (Zagreb): Prohibition of Retroactivity as Procedural Human Right. Some Remarks from a Historical PerspectiveBianca Laarhoven, Stefan Nieuwendijk and Jeffrey van Nuland (Maastricht): Research on "the paradox of access to justice"
|
Friday, May 30
Morning Session (9,30 - 13,00)
Lunch break (13,00 - 14,00)
Afternoon Session(14,00 - 15,30)
Wrap‐up and departure (15,30 - 17,00)
| Panel: Legal Clinics and Advice Centers in the service of enhancing access to justice Participants: Legal Clinics and clinical initiatives from Croatia, UK, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Norway, and the Netherlands ‐ Alan Russel (London): Legal Clinic at London South Bank University ‐ Mona McKiernan (Oslo): The Current Work and Projects of Juss Buss ‐ Mateja Crnković (Zagreb): Access to Administrative Justice in the Light of Analysis of Zagreb Legal Clinic Cases ‐ Students of Zagreb Legal Clinic: How Legal Clinic in Zagreb Developed to one of the Major Legal Aid Providers in Croatia? ‐ Asmira Bećiraj, Ajna Bakrač (Bihać): Developing Legal Clinic in Bihać – Challenges and Achievements
|
Project DEECP: JUST/2011‐2012/JCIV/AG/3434
Dimensions of evidence in civil procedure
With financial support from the Civil Justice/Criminal Justice Programme of the European Union
- DIGI - GUARD
- Diversity of Enforcement Titles in cross-border Debt Collection in EU
- Train to Enforce
- Remedies concerning Enforcement of Foreign Judgements according to Brussels I Recast
- LAWtrain
- Developments and trend in the regulation of the attorney's profession with the emphasis on Slovenia and Germany
- Civil vs "Common Law" – the assessment of »rules« of evidence law (testing the admissibility of electronic evidence in common law and continental law systems)
- Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure
- Role of Faculty of Law
- Conferences and other activities
- Conference "Evidence in Civil Procedure - Fundamental issues and challenge of reforms" 2013
- Conference "Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure" 2014
- Conference "Procedural Human Rights and Access to Justice in the World of Emergencies and Economic Crisis" 2014
- Programme
- Conference materials
- Conference gallery
- Conference "European Dimension of Taking Evidence in Civil Procedure" 2015
- Project results
- Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU
- European Enforcement Order
- Medicine, Law and Society
- CRP Service